UK’s Chagos 99-Year Deal Scolded as ‘Diabolical’ Amidst Jugnauth Money-Laundering Probe

The proposed deal between the UK and Mauritius regarding the Chagos Islands has drawn sharp criticism from a prominent British commentator, Adam Brooks, even as former Mauritian Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth faces scrutiny in a separate financial investigation.

The agreement, which would see the UK transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, has been met with disapproval from several British commentators and analysts, including Brooks. Speaking on GB News, Brooks delivered a scathing critique of the deal.

“I’m from Essex, I know a dodgy deal when I see one, and this is diabolical,” Brooks stated, employing a familiar and relatable analogy. “It’s like me giving my friend my shed and then saying to my friend, I will pay you for the next 99 years for me to use my own shed.”

Brooks’ assessment comes at a time of heightened attention surrounding the agreement. The backdrop to this debate involves the ongoing legal and political tensions regarding the ownership and administration of the Chagos Islands, as well as the displacement of its native population and the presence of the strategic US military base.

The timing of Brooks’ comments is particularly sensitive, as it coincides with a separate money-laundering investigation involving former Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth. Jugnauth was questioned by Mauritius’ Financial Crimes Commission following a three-hour search of his home. The investigation stems from the raid of a close associate’s home, where authorities reportedly found large sums of cash in multiple currencies, as well as luxury items.

The UK Perspective

Brooks, speaking from a UK perspective, questioned the rationale behind the Chagos Islands deal. “Why would I give something away that I already have? That base is at no risk,” he argued, highlighting the strategic importance of the islands and the potential implications of transferring control. He further predicted potential international opposition to the agreement, pointing to possible objections from the United States.

The financial aspects of the deal also drew criticism from the commentator. “It’s £10 million, which our Government seems to throw around like confetti,” Brooks stated, referencing UK government expenditures. “Our pensioners are not being able to heat their homes. We should not send £1 to Mauritius.”

Chloe Dobbs, also a commentator on GB News, echoed Brooks’ sentiments, branding the deal as “nonsense.” “You can argue that the cost is being spread over many years, but we shouldn’t be giving it away in the first place regardless. It’s our base now, we’re giving it away. We’re basically paying someone to take something from us,” Dobbs stated.

The investigation into former Prime Minister Jugnauth has raised further concerns. The Financial Crimes Commission of Mauritius (FCC) has frozen the passports of Jugnauth, his wife, brother-in-law, and the associate whose home was searched. Mauritian Labour Minister Reza Uteem confirmed that this is standard procedure.

Source: GB News