News
Mauritius Aims to Halt Reckless Behaviour During Natural Disasters

A harrowing incident last week, where a man was swept away while attempting to take photos during a torrential downpour in Gris-Gris, has brought to light the glaring gaps in Mauritius’ laws when it comes to dealing with natural catastrophes. As the island nation struggles to cope with the devastating impact of climate change, the Law Reform Commission has proposed a radical overhaul of the current system, recommending stringent measures to curb reckless behaviour and protect citizens.

Penalties to Deter Would-Be Thrill-Seekers
Under the proposed legislation, anyone caught venturing outdoors during a cyclone warning or torrential rain alert could face a stiff fine of up to Rs 500,000 (approximately £9,500) and a maximum two-year prison sentence.
While this may seem drastic, the commission argues that such measures are necessary to prevent avoidable risks and ensure the safety of both the public and emergency responders.
Exceptions for Those in Genuine Need
However, the proposed law does provide for exemptions, allowing essential personnel, such as police, firefighters, and medical staff, to continue performing their duties during these critical periods.
Additionally, individuals with genuine medical emergencies or those requiring essential supplies will also be permitted to move about, albeit with necessary precautions.
Paying the Price for Recklessness
In a bold move, the commission has suggested introducing a “rescue tariff,” where individuals who engage in reckless behaviour, necessitating costly rescue operations, could be held financially responsible for the expenses incurred by the state.
This provision, inspired by international models, aims to promote a sense of responsibility among citizens and reduce the number of avoidable interventions, thereby optimizing the use of public resources.
A cap of Rs 500,000 per intervention has been proposed to prevent undue financial burden on individuals.
A Balancing Act
While the commission believes these recommendations will significantly enhance public safety and reduce risk-taking behaviour, some have raised concerns about the potential social implications of financial penalties for those in distress.
The implementation of such measures will require a rigorous framework to prevent injustice and ensure that those who genuinely need help are not deterred from seeking it.
A Step in the Right Direction?
As Mauritius grapples with the consequences of climate change, these proposals mark a significant step towards rethinking public safety during natural disasters.
The question remains whether these measures will be adopted and, if so, in what form they will be incorporated into the country’s legislative framework.
Source: Defi Media