Pravin Jugnauth: “You Act as if Mauritius is the Only Country to Have Done It”

On Friday, November 1, former Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth held a press conference at Treasury Building in Port-Louis to explain the recent decision by his government to censor social media platforms in Mauritius. This decision made in the wake of emerging videos related to the ongoing Moustass leaks scandal.

At the outset of the press conference, Jugnauth acknowledged the existence of new videos circulating on social media, three of which reportedly contain audio that he confirmed is his own voice. He described the situation as an instance of “cyber-terrorism” targeting his office.

In response to questions about the implications of supposedly sensitive communications being accessed, Jugnauth rhetorically asked, “Is it my office? Is my secretary being tapped?

Can the opposition really listen in on my phone calls?” He emphasized that while he acknowledges the voice is his, an investigation is necessary to ascertain the authenticity of the audio recordings.

Jugnauth further asserted that his office’s secure landline—a channel through which he communicates with legal advisors, foreign contacts, and personal acquaintances—had been compromised.

Given the current circumstances, he expressed satisfaction that the government had to take measures such as social media censorship.

However, he assured that his administration is working with social media platforms to restore access to the public as soon as cooperation is achieved.

He criticized his political opponents, suggesting that their actions stem from desperation.

Jugnauth stated that elections will proceed as scheduled, but he is prepared to take necessary measures to maintain social harmony.

When asked by reporters whether it would be prudent for the police commissioner, who is constitutionally protected, to step back during the investigation, he responded that such individuals should remain until the inquiry is concluded.

As for whether the suspension of social media was an appropriate response to the situation, Jugnauth defended the decision as “the most proportionate action under the current circumstances.”

He questioned whether it was solely his decision that had potentially harmed the country, suggesting that the allegations themselves could be more damaging.

Jugnauth also emphasized that the decision to censor social media platforms has been implemented in various countries, including England.

He affirmed that certain situations arise that necessitate action, declaring, “When faced with such circumstances, we must take action.”

Source: Le Mauricien